Skip to main content

The Election Is Over. What Happens Next Will Define Us.

The Election Is Over. What Happens Next Will Define Us.

Mark Carney and the Liberal Party have won the 2025 federal election.

Some Canadians are relieved — believing Carney brings competence and global respect.
Others are furious — seeing this outcome as proof that Eastern political monopolies continue to drown out the West.
Many more?
They’re just exhausted — tired of promises, polarization, and politics that feel more performative than productive.

This isn’t a moment of national unity.
It’s a moment of reckoning.

And regardless of whether you’re celebrating, grieving, or just numb — the hard truth is this:

✅ Democracy doesn’t end on election night.
❌ And it sure as hell doesn’t run on autopilot for four years.

The real test of our democracy is not who wins — it’s what we, the people, are willing to tolerate after they’ve won.

Do we go quiet?
Do we get cynical and shut down?
Do we let our disillusionment become a permission slip for disengagement?

Or do we rise — pissed off, hopeful, skeptical, determined — and say:

Enough performative governance. Do your job. Deliver on your promises. Represent the country — not just your voter base.

Because the next four years?
They aren’t about who we elected.
They’re about whether we, as Canadians, are finally ready to act like democracy is something we do — not just something we inherit.

So yes, Carney won.

But now the real question — the only one that matters — is:

What now?

No Matter Who You Voted For — This Is Still Your Country

It’s easy to forget, in the roar of election rhetoric and the wreckage of campaign spin, that politics is not the country.

Parties change. Leaders rise and fall. Platforms shift. But Canada — your home — remains ours to shape.

And if you woke up the morning after the election feeling betrayed, bitter, or just plain numb, let me tell you:
Those emotions are not signs of disengagement.
They are signs that you still care — that you haven’t given up.

So many Canadians are politically homeless right now.
Not because they’re apathetic — but because they’re paying attention.
They’ve watched parties make promises they never intended to keep.
They’ve seen urban centers get all the perks while rural communities are ignored.
They’ve seen vote-rich provinces dominate policy while the rest of the country waits in the wings.

And yet… we keep showing up.
We vote.
We argue.
We organize.
We hold hope in one hand and disillusionment in the other.

That is what democracy looks like — not perfection, but persistence.

You may not love who’s in power right now.
But whether you marked your ballot red, blue, orange, green, purple, or just spoiled it out of protest — this is still your country.
And your right — your responsibility — to shape its future didn’t end when you dropped your ballot in a box. It began.

Because democracy isn’t a game you lose.
It’s a house you live in.
And when something’s broken? You don’t burn it down.
You fix the damn foundation.

So don’t withdraw. Don’t “wait and see.” Don’t let your silence get mistaken for satisfaction.
Speak louder. Show up more. Get in the way.

Because if the people in power aren’t hearing you, you’re not yelling loud enough yet.

The Problem Beneath the Ballot: Canada’s Electoral System Is Broken

For all our talk about democracy, fairness, and unity, Canada’s federal electoral system is structurally rigged to favour population centers, marginalize regional voices, and distort the will of voters.

We use first-past-the-post (FPTP) — a system so outdated that most modern democracies have abandoned it or heavily modified it. And for good reason.

Here’s what it means in practice:

  • You can win 100% of the power with just 35–40% of the vote

  • A party can earn millions of votes and walk away with almost no seats

  • Entire provinces can vote overwhelmingly for one party and get nothing in return

Sound familiar?

In the 2025 election, like the ones before it, the results were practically decided before a single vote was counted west of Ontario.
And that’s not just frustrating — it’s undemocratic.

Let’s Break It Down

In Canada, your vote doesn’t go to a national total — it goes to whoever wins your local riding.
If your candidate loses, your vote disappears from the national outcome.
There is no reward for second place, no proportional representation, and no seat for popular vote unless it directly translates to riding wins.

That’s why in 2025:

  • The Liberal Party could secure a majority of seats with less than 40% of the vote

  • The Green Party, with a measurable national presence, might win 1 or 2 seats — despite hundreds of thousands of votes

  • Small parties like the PPC, Mavericks, or regional independents have zero path to influence without media manipulation, controversy, or scandal-driven attention

It’s a system that rewards consolidation, punishes nuance, and shuts out diversity of thought.

And Then There’s Regional Imbalance

Every election, the same refrain echoes across the Prairies and the North:

“Why even bother voting? Ontario and Quebec will decide it anyway.”

And they’re not wrong.

Ontario and Quebec hold 199 out of 338 seats — nearly 60% of Parliament.
So unless there’s a massive political shift in those two provinces, the rest of the country is just watching the score from the bleachers.

Meanwhile:

  • Alberta (population ~4.6M) has 34 seats

  • Saskatchewan (population ~1.2M) has 14

  • Atlantic Canada, despite significant geographic and cultural uniqueness, is often reduced to a swing-bloc afterthought

And the territories, home to Indigenous voices and some of the most vulnerable communities in the country? Three seats. Total.
That’s less representation than the city of Mississauga.

The Consequences Are Real

This isn’t just about optics — it affects lives.

  • Policies skew toward vote-rich urban centers

  • Resource industries are vilified or mismanaged by distant governments

  • Housing, healthcare, energy, and taxation policy get tailored to swing ridings, not national equity

  • Regional alienation festers, fueling movements like WEXIT, Northern sovereignty pushes, and widespread civic apathy

And the worst part?

Parties have no incentive to fix this.
They win under this system. So they defend it.
And we — the voters — are left to decide between strategic voting or surrender.

This isn’t a fringe issue.
It’s not just political theory or constitutional trivia.
It’s the reason millions of Canadians feel unheard — and are unheard.

If we want a better country, we need a better system.
And that means recognizing that the problem isn’t who’s in power
It’s how they got it.

A Better Model: Equal Provincial Representation + Popular Vote

If Canada is going to call itself a functioning democracy, then it’s time we started acting like one — with a system that represents every Canadian, not just the most densely packed ridings.

Right now, elections are decided by vote clusters — not vote counts. That’s how a party can win a majority of seats with a minority of the popular vote, while millions of ballots cast across the rest of the country effectively get tossed into the void.

This isn’t just inefficient. It’s fundamentally unjust.

What if we redesigned the system to actually reflect the will of the people — and the structure of the country?

The 18 + 8 Model: A Made-in-Canada Electoral Solution

Before we dive into solutions, it’s important to remember:
Electoral reform isn’t a new conversation in Canada.

In fact, in 2015, the Liberal Party under Justin Trudeau explicitly promised that “this will be the last election under first-past-the-post.”
A national committee was formed. Consultations were held. Public support was high.

And then… it was dropped.

Why?
Because the party in power realized the current system was working for them.

And that’s exactly why reform can’t be left up to the winners of the system — it has to come from us.

If we want a democracy that actually represents the country, it’s going to have to be citizen-driven — not party-dependent.

Let’s break it down:

  • 🇨🇦 338 total seats in the House of Commons

  • 🧩 26 seats per province and territory, regardless of population

    • 18 seats: Elected by traditional first-past-the-post (FPTP) riding contests

    • 8 seats: Awarded based on the popular vote breakdown in each province/territory

This model preserves local representation and riding accountability — your MP still matters.
But it also ensures that your vote counts, even if your candidate didn’t win the riding. Every vote influences the final seat count.

How It Would Work — Example: Alberta

Let’s say Alberta casts 1.5 million votes in a federal election. Here’s what the breakdown looks like:

  • Conservatives win 60% of the total provincial vote

  • Liberals win 20%

  • NDP takes 10%

  • PPC captures 5%

  • Green and others split the remaining 5%

Under the current system, Conservatives could sweep nearly all ridings and walk away with almost 100% of the seats — despite 40% of Albertans voting against them.

But under the 18+8 model, it looks more like this:

Alberta’s 26 House of Commons seats:

Party % of Provincial Vote Riding Wins (of 18) Proportional Seats (of 8) Total Seats
Conservatives 60% 12 5 17
Liberals 20% 3 2 5
NDP 10% 2 1 3
PPC 5% 1 0 1
Green/Others 5% 0 0 0

Why It Works

This model reflects the actual will of the voters — not just where they live. It means:

  • Every vote counts toward something

  • Regional fairness is baked in — not an afterthought

  • Small parties with real support get a seat at the table

  • No more elections decided before the West finishes dinner

It’s not about tilting the table. It’s about rebalancing it — so that whether you live in Nunavut or North Bay, your voice matters the same.

Why This Matters

This model:

  • Levels the playing field between provinces

    • Equal seats = equal voice, regardless of population

  • Bridges the divide between national and regional parties

    • Regional parties can gain ground without dominating entire provinces

  • Ends “strategic voting”

    • People vote for what they believe in, not what they fear

  • Encourages collaboration

    • Governments would be formed by negotiation, not just winner-take-all mandates

  • De-radicalizes politics

    • With representation guaranteed, fewer voters feel like blowing the whole thing up is their only option

Common Objections (And Why They Don’t Hold Up)

“But that’s not how democracy works!”

Actually, it is — in most of the democratic world.
Germany, New Zealand, Scotland, Ireland, Norway — all use some form of proportional representation. And guess what? Their voter turnout is higher, their political polarization is lower, and they’ve managed to avoid the kind of regional resentment that now defines Canada’s West-East dynamic.

“Smaller provinces shouldn’t get equal seats.”

If we’re a true federation, then every province matters — not just in economic output, but in governance.
This isn’t about population — it’s about political balance.
If we want to keep the country united, we need to give every region a reason to stay engaged.

“But Isn’t This Too Complicated?”

Electoral reform always gets dismissed as “too messy,” “too confusing,” or “too idealistic.” But most of that fear comes from people who benefit from the status quo — not the public.

Here’s the truth:

  • We already run complicated tax systems, health care programs, and electoral boundaries.

  • Germany, New Zealand, Ireland, and many others already use proportional systems with better results and higher voter trust.

  • And yes, it might take an extra five minutes to explain. But we should never let simplicity trump fairness when designing the rules of democracy.

The greater danger isn’t a more complex ballot — it’s keeping a system that actively discourages people from voting at all

There is no perfect system.
But there are better ones.
And pretending that our current model is “good enough” is how you lose public trust, decade by decade.

The 18+8 model may not be the final answer — but it’s a powerful conversation starter.
And it reflects what millions of Canadians already feel:

Representation shouldn’t depend on your postal code.

If we want a country that works for all of us, then the system that governs it needs to represent all of us.

It’s time.

Democracy Only Works When We Do

This election wasn’t the end of the story. It was the beginning of the next chapter.
And what happens now — in our cities, our ridings, our school boards, our inboxes — will determine whether Canada remains a country governed by its people, or one run over them.

If you’re tired of the lies, the manipulation, and the rigged math — you’re not alone.
But if we don’t act, nothing changes.

So let’s show up. Let’s push back. Let’s rebuild the democracy we thought we had.

Canada needs more than new politicians. It needs a new way of being heard.

And that starts now.

What You Can Do Over the Next 4 Years

This isn’t the part where we say, “Well, maybe next time.”
This is the part where we build the pressure cooker — and keep the heat on until things change.

If you’re frustrated, disappointed, or fired up — good. Now channel it.

✅ 1. Track Promises — Then Demand Action

Most campaign promises are made to be forgotten.
Unless we remind them, loudly and repeatedly, what they said they’d do.

Here’s how to keep receipts:

  • Download the 2025 Liberal platform and highlight every promise that affects you — housing, healthcare, climate, cost of living.

  • Bookmark your MP’s voting record on OpenParliament.ca, PoliMonitor.ca, or TheyWorkForYou.ca.

  • Set a calendar reminder 12–18 months from now with the subject line:
    “Hey, did they deliver?”

When campaign promises quietly disappear from the spotlight — drag them back.

Ask publicly.
Tag them.
Write in.
Call local media.
Hold receipts and raise hell.

✅ 2. Write Your MP (Even If You Didn’t Vote for Them)

MPs represent everyone in their riding — not just their voter base.
So use that.

Here’s what to say:

Subject: Electoral Reform & Representation Fairness

Message Template:

“I’m a constituent in your riding. I believe Canada’s electoral system is failing to represent all voices fairly. I’d like to know where you stand on proportional representation and regional seat equality. Do you support a national dialogue or legislation to fix this system in the next four years?”

Short. Clear. Direct.

If they don’t respond?
Screenshot the silence. Post it. Tag them.
Because accountability isn’t aggression — it’s democracy.

📍 Find your MP here

✅ 3. Join or Start a Reform Movement

You’re not alone.
Organizations across Canada are already pushing for this — they just need more voices, more volume, and more visibility.

Start with:

Not a joiner? Start small.

  • Host a “What is Electoral Reform?” night with your friends

  • Create a local civic Discord/WhatsApp group

  • Write a letter to your local paper — or submit a guest op-ed

This fight doesn’t belong to politicians.
It belongs to you.

✅ 4. Demand Representation Reform — Not Just Another Party Swap

Parties will always promise better outcomes — but if the system stays broken, the results will too.

Demand:

  • Equal provincial seat allocation

  • Mixed-member proportional ballots

  • Threshold representation for smaller parties

  • Citizen assemblies to guide reform

Ask every candidate running municipally or provincially:

“Do you support federal electoral reform?”

Don’t just ask the big names. Ask the independents, the fringe voices, the city councillors.
Normalize the conversation.

Final Rally Point

You’ve got four years.

Four years to:

  • Educate

  • Agitate

  • Organize

  • Demand

If we spend it doomscrolling, ranting in echo chambers, or waiting for someone else to fix it,
we’ll be here again in 2029 — angrier, more divided, and just as powerless.

So start now.

Be loud.
Be smart.
Be relentless.

Because nothing changes if we don’t push.
And no one in Ottawa reforms a system that keeps them winning — unless we make them.

Democracy Only Works When We Do

It’s easy — so, so easy — to fall into the trap of thinking democracy is something we have rather than something we do.
As if it’s a permanent trophy in a glass case somewhere, immune to dust, decay, or theft.

But the truth is far less comforting:

Democracy is not a guarantee. It’s an agreement.
And agreements have to be renewed — actively, fiercely, constantly.

Every time we show up.
Every time we speak out.
Every time we refuse to be gaslit into thinking “this is just how it works.”

That’s when democracy is real.
Not when we vote every few years. Not when we scream into Twitter voids.
But when we recognize that between elections is where citizenship lives.

Because Here’s the Hard Truth:

If we disengage — they win.
If we settle for less — they deliver less.
If we allow cynicism to harden into apathy — the system doesn’t correct itself. It calcifies.

And slowly, quietly, the walls close in.

Maybe not with jackboots and flags.
Maybe just with shrugging, smaller choices:

  • Less transparency here.

  • More executive power there.

  • A few fewer rights for “efficiency.”

  • A little less fairness “because tradition.”

Until one day you wake up and realize the democracy you thought you lived in is just a memory you’re nostalgic for — not a reality you can touch.

Democracy Isn’t Self-Cleaning

It’s messy.
It’s imperfect.
It’s aggravating.
And it is absolutely worth the fight.

Not because politicians deserve it.
But because we do.

We deserve:

  • A system where every vote counts.

  • A government that fears its citizens more than it fears losing its base.

  • A future where regional alienation isn’t treated as a political inevitability but a solvable injustice.

Final Call:

This isn’t just about 2025.
It’s about 2029. 2033. 2045.
It’s about the country your kids — or your neighbour’s kids — will inherit.

And whether they’ll inherit a real democracy, or just the word for it.

Because if we want a country that reflects all of us, it’s not enough to criticize what’s broken.

We have to be the ones who fix it.

Not someday.
Not when it’s easier.
Not when it’s less messy.
Now.

The election is over. The anger is real. The disillusionment is justified.
But none of it matters unless we turn it into action.

Democracy isn’t dead. It’s just waiting.

Waiting for us to remember:

“Democracy isn’t dead.
It’s just waiting for you to remember you’re in charge.”

As a recent example of the flawed FPTP voting system, The Carleton riding in the 2025 federal election featured an unusually large field of candidates. Over 100 candidates in only one riding in all of Canada, mostly independent and only in Pierre Poilievre’s riding. In previous federal elections, Carleton had far fewer candidates:

• 2021 federal election: 5 candidates.
• 2019 federal election: 5 candidates.
• 2015 federal election: 5 candidates.

So, it would appear to anyone looking at this that someone, somewhere deliberately sabotaged Pierre Poilievre’s riding by overloading it with unqualified and insubstantial candidates to split votes and erode the Conservative voting base. Why weren’t there over 100 candidates in Carney’s riding? Who funded these candidates? How many votes did they each receive?

As it turned out, the unprecedented number of candidates—91 in total—in the Carleton riding during the 2025 federal election was in-fact a deliberate protest organized by the Longest Ballot Committee, an activist group advocating for electoral reform in Canada. This group has previously employed similar tactics in other ridings to draw attention to the perceived shortcomings of the first-past-the-post (FPTP) voting system. ​

In Carleton, the Longest Ballot Committee’s strategy aimed to highlight how the FPTP system can lead to disproportionate representation, where a candidate can win without securing a majority of the votes. By flooding the ballot with numerous independent and unaffiliated candidates, the group sought to demonstrate the potential for vote splitting and the limitations of the current electoral framework.​

Despite the large number of candidates, the election results in Carleton showed that the majority of votes were concentrated among the main party candidates. Liberal candidate Bruce Fanjoy won the seat with 42,374 votes, narrowly defeating Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre, who received 39,585 votes. The remaining 89 candidates collectively garnered a minimal share of the vote, indicating that the protest did not significantly alter the outcome but succeeded in bringing attention to the issue of electoral reform. ​

As for the funding of these candidates, there is no public evidence to suggest that they were financially supported by any major political party or external organization. The Longest Ballot Committee operates as an independent activist group, and its initiatives are typically grassroots in nature. Elections Canada requires all candidates to adhere to strict financial disclosure regulations, ensuring transparency in campaign financing.​

The situation in Carleton underscores the ongoing debate about the efficacy and fairness of Canada’s electoral system. While the protest did not change the election’s outcome, it succeeded in sparking discussions about potential reforms to better reflect the diverse political views of Canadians.

Image Courtesy of Krisztina Szabo Rausch