Skip to main content

From Fringe to Front Page

Just a few years ago, serious discussions about UFOs (now more formally referred to as UAPs—Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena) were mostly confined to conspiracy forums and science fiction. But in recent years, a global wave of government disclosures, declassified reports, and eyewitness testimonies has propelled the topic into the mainstream. No longer the domain of cranks and conspiracy theorists, UAPs are now a subject of legitimate national security concern.

Here’s what we now know—based on official documents, scientific inquiry, and direct testimony from military officials and former intelligence insiders.

What Are UAPs?

UAP stands for Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena, a term now officially adopted by major defense and scientific agencies such as NASA, the Pentagon, and Canada’s Department of National Defence. This term replaces the older and more culturally loaded acronym “UFO” (Unidentified Flying Object), broadening the scope to include not just flying objects, but any phenomena observed in the atmosphere, outer space, or underwater that defy current scientific understanding and technological explanation.

Unlike the term “UFO,” which often carries associations with aliens or science fiction, “UAP” emphasizes scientific neutrality. It’s an umbrella classification used to describe phenomena that remain unexplained even after thorough analysis by qualified experts.

According to a 2023 U.S. Department of Defense definition:

“UAP refers to airborne, transmedium, and submersible objects or phenomena that are not immediately identifiable, and that display flight dynamics or characteristics inconsistent with known aircraft, spacecraft, or natural occurrences.”

Key characteristics often attributed to UAPs include:

  • Lack of visible propulsion systems
  • Sudden acceleration or direction changes beyond known human capability
  • Transmedium travel (e.g., moving from air to sea without losing speed or structural integrity)
  • Radar and infrared invisibility while being visually confirmed

The shift to “UAP” also reflects a global effort to reframe the conversation in scientific and military terms, removing stigma and inviting serious research.

> Learn more: U.S. National Archives UAP FAQ

UAPs are real, they are being tracked, and they remain unexplained. What once was relegated to sci-fi is now a question of science, security, and potentially, paradigm-shifting discovery.

Is UAP the Same as a Drone?

Not quite. UAPs are not immediately assumed to be drones, satellites, or aircraft. In fact, a key aspect of UAP designation is that no existing technology (commercial or military) can explain the behavior, speed, acceleration, or radar signatures of the object in question.

If a drone is positively identified as the source, the incident is reclassified and removed from the UAP database. This filtering ensures that only truly unexplained encounters remain under the “UAP” label.

UAPs Aren’t Just in the Air

A growing number of UAP sightings involve unidentified submerged objects (USOs) or objects transitioning between air and water with no visible propulsion system. These are especially concerning to military officials because of the potential security risks involved near naval fleets and undersea installations.

According to a 2023 hearing before the U.S. Congress:

| “These phenomena are frequently observed near sensitive military operations, including nuclear missile silos and underwater test ranges.”
Congressional Hearing on UAPs, July 2023

The Legitimization of UAPs

In July 2021, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) released its first-ever public report on UAPs, acknowledging 144 military encounters with unexplained aerial phenomena. Of these, 143 remained unexplained.

A follow-up March 2024 Pentagon report (read the full text here) made further waves by stating that “some UAPs exhibit flight characteristics beyond known technology.”

|  “We cannot rule out non-human intelligence,” the report concluded.

From Laughing Stock to Legitimate: How UAPs Entered the Mainstream

🔹 1. 2017 New York Times Bombshell

In December 2017, The New York Times published a groundbreaking article titled:

“Glowing Auras and ‘Black Money’: The Pentagon’s Mysterious UFO Program”

This article revealed that the U.S. Department of Defense had been secretly operating a program called the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP) since 2007, with a $22 million budget. It was led by Luis Elizondo, who later went public to push for transparency on UAPs.

🔗 Read the article

 

🔹 2. Leaked Navy Videos (2004–2015)

Three U.S. Navy videos, labeled “FLIR1,” “Gimbal,” and “GoFast”, captured military pilots encountering UAPs exhibiting impossible flight characteristics:

  • Instant acceleration

  • No visible propulsion

  • No heat signature

  • Ability to hover, then dart at hypersonic speeds

The videos were officially declassified and confirmed as authentic by the Pentagon in 2020.

🔗 See the videos on the U.S. Navy website

U.S. Government Reports & Hearings

🔸 June 2021 – First Public U.S. Intelligence Report on UAPs

The Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) released its first public assessment on UAPs, analyzing 144 reports from military and government sources.

Key findings:

  • 143 of 144 incidents remained unexplained

  • 18 incidents showed “unusual movement patterns or flight characteristics”

  • UAPs are a potential threat to flight safety and national security 🔗 Read the unclassified ODNI report

🔸 July 2023 – Historic Congressional Hearing

At a hearing before the U.S. House Oversight Committee:

  • David Grusch, a former U.S. intelligence official, testified under oath that the U.S. has retrieved “non-human biological material” from crash sites.

  • Commander David Fravor, a Navy pilot, described the Tic Tac UAP encounter (2004) off the USS Nimitz.

  • Lawmakers from both parties called for more transparency and whistleblower protections.

🔗 NPR coverage of the hearing

Canadian Government Joins the Conversation

In February 2024, CTV News reported that Canada’s top government scientist, Dr. Eric Choi, proposed an official research initiative into UAPs. A confidential report tabled in Parliament recommended Canada collaborate with NORAD, NASA, and other allies to:

  • Track unidentified aerial anomalies

  • Investigate potential national security risks

  • Engage with scientific institutions to determine origin and nature

🔗 CTV News: Canadian UAP Report

A New Language, A New Legitimacy

  • “UFOs” are now officially “UAPs” (Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena).

  • The U.S. has established an official research office: the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) under the Department of Defense.

  • NASA released its first-ever public UAP report in 2023, calling for greater scientific investigation and data collection.

🔗 NASA UAP Report Summary

One of the Most Important Testimonials of Our Lifetime

Imminent: Inside the Pentagon’s Hunt for UFOs

Author: Luis Elizondo
Published: 2023
Publisher: Harper Horizon
Foreword by: Christopher Mellon, former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Intelligence

Luis Elizondo, a former senior counterintelligence officer and director of the Pentagon’s Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP), provides in Imminent a compelling and insider’s account of how the U.S. government has known about UAPs for decades, and how bureaucratic resistance, secrecy, and fear of stigma have prevented the truth from coming to light—until recently.

What the Book Reveals:

Institutional Obstruction and Bureaucratic Sabotage

  • Elizondo recounts how senior Pentagon officials worked to suppress the release of UAP information, often out of career protection, political fear, or religious ideology.

  • He describes deliberate attempts to prevent briefings to Congress, bury reports, and derail the growing momentum toward public disclosure.

  • Internal memos and whistleblower complaints (some later released) showed that officials blocked him from accessing materials or threatened his security credentials.

Push for Congressional Briefings

  • Despite resistance, Elizondo personally briefed members of the Senate Armed Services and Intelligence Committees, including Senator Marco Rubio and Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, on the national security implications of UAPs.

  • He emphasized incursions near nuclear facilities, aircraft carrier groups, and sensitive airspace, raising serious strategic defense concerns.

  • These briefings played a direct role in establishing the UAP Task Force in 2020 and later the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO).

A Global Phenomenon, Not Just American

  • Elizondo asserts that UAPs are being seen worldwide, including by allied military forces.

  • He calls for international cooperation, comparing the issue to climate change or space debris: it transcends borders and requires transparency, data sharing, and independent science.

📡 Technological Capabilities of UAPs

  • Describes multiple cases in which UAPs demonstrated:

    • Sudden right-angle turns at hypersonic speeds

    • Acceleration from 0 to Mach 5+ in seconds

    • No visible propulsion, wings, or exhaust

    • Cloaking capabilities and radar invisibility

    • Transmedium travel (air to water and vice versa)

  • These features exceed current human technological understanding, suggesting either a radically advanced unknown terrestrial technology or non-human origin.

Luis Elizondo’s Senate & Public Testimony:

Key Senate Takeaways (2022–2024, U.S. Senate Intelligence & Armed Services Committees)

  • UAPs regularly enter restricted military airspace with no response capability from U.S. forces.

  • Elizondo testified that “crafts of unknown origin” have disabled nuclear missiles during live-fire readiness tests—a fact corroborated by multiple Air Force veterans.

  • Warned that ignoring UAP incursions is a risk to national defense, especially given the lack of data sharing between defense and scientific agencies.

  • Testified that UAP programs had been compartmentalized and misclassified, making oversight difficult—even among top Pentagon officials.

“We may not be alone—and that reality comes with responsibility. We owe it to our children, our national security, and our scientific integrity to stop denying what’s been plainly visible for decades.”
Luis Elizondo, closed-door testimony before Senate Intelligence Committee, March 2023

Non-Human Materials & Biological Evidence

  • While Elizondo himself did not confirm direct access to non-human technology, he stated under oath that individuals within defense and intelligence communities had briefed him on retrieved materials from “non-human origin” craft.

  • This testimony aligns with that of David Grusch, a whistleblower from the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, who later testified that “non-human biologics” were recovered from crash sites.

Support from Other Officials

Elizondo is backed by several high-ranking former government insiders:

  • Christopher Mellon (former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Intelligence):
    Has publicly advocated for greater UAP transparency, confirming many of Elizondo’s claims regarding stonewalling within the Pentagon.

  • Senator Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY):
    A key driver behind the creation of AARO, has stated on record:

    “We’ve seen enough credible evidence that this is no longer a question of belief. It’s a question of response.”

  • Former Navy Commander David Fravor:
    Pilot who encountered the famous “Tic Tac” object in 2004, also testified alongside Elizondo.

Summary: Imminent Is a Warning and a Call to Action

  • Elizondo describes Imminent not as a book about aliens, but about transparency, accountability, and risk mitigation.

  • He warns that ignoring UAPs poses a multi-dimensional threat—including:

    • Technological surprise

    • Military vulnerability

    • Scientific stagnation

    • Public trust erosion

🔗 Available now through major retailers
Buy Imminent on Amazon

What the Latest Government Reports Say

(AARO, NASA, and U.S. Intelligence Agencies)
Last major updates: March 2024 – February 2025

Over the past two years, both the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) and NASA have taken the lead in formalizing the U.S. government’s investigation of Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAPs). These efforts are part of a widening institutional push for scientific inquiry, public accountability, and national security assessment regarding the UAP issue.

AARO Report — March 2024

Published by: U.S. Department of Defense
Full Title: “Report on the Historical Record of U.S. Government Involvement with Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena”
🔗 Read the full AARO report (PDF)

Key Takeaways:

  • No verified evidence of extraterrestrial origin was found in over 70 years of government investigations, but dozens of incidents remain unexplained due to incomplete data or sensor anomalies.

  • The U.S. has never recovered a confirmed alien spacecraft or “non-human biologics”, according to this report.

  • Many UAP reports were linked to:

    • Spy drones or surveillance aircraft

    • Balloon debris

    • Sensor malfunctions or human error

BUT—Notably, the report did not deny:

  • That advanced craft had been observed by credible military witnesses.

  • That classified material exists which remains outside the purview of AARO.

  • That retrieved “anomalous materials” (possibly exotic alloys) have been examined by defense contractors such as Battelle and Lockheed Martin’s Skunk Works (information currently unconfirmed but under Congressional inquiry).

“We cannot rule out foreign adversary programs, but we are also not in a position to definitively attribute certain UAPs to known sources.”
Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick, Director of AARO, March 2024

NASA UAP Study — Final Report, September 2023

Lead: Dr. David Spergel (Astrophysicist, NASA Science Panel Chair)

🔗 NASA UAP Report Overview

Key Findings:

  • NASA found no direct evidence of extraterrestrial technology—but emphasized that the current data is insufficient for firm conclusions.

  • UAPs are a real phenomenon, observed across multiple sensor systems (visual, radar, infrared), and deserve scientific investigation.

  • The report urged the removal of stigma around UAP research to promote open data sharing among military, intelligence, and civilian institutions.

NASA’s New UAP Strategy:

  • Appointed a new Director of UAP Research (identity classified for security reasons).

  • Proposes to use earth observation satellites, AI data analysis, and crowdsourced citizen science tools (like smartphone tracking apps) to gather new UAP data.

  • Recommends open-access, peer-reviewed analysis of all UAP-related sensor data moving forward.

“The most important thing is that we treat this as a scientific problem. If we want answers, we need better data—not assumptions.”
Dr. David Spergel, NASA UAP Panel Chair

Summary Comparison: AARO vs. NASA

Feature AARO (DoD) NASA (Science Panel)
Focus National security, defense airspace Scientific exploration, public research
Conclusion No extraterrestrial proof, some unknowns No alien confirmation, data quality lacking
Response Plan Continue investigations via AARO & allies Launch scientific monitoring & satellite support
Transparency Moderate – Some reports classified High – Public report, press briefings
Tools Used Military sensors, historical records Space assets, AI analytics, citizen science

What This Means for the Public

The era of official silence and mockery toward Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAPs) has ended. For decades, citizens who reported sightings were laughed off, discredited, or ignored. Today, the message is dramatically different: governments acknowledge UAPs are real—and they don’t know what they are.

No More Denial: UAPs Are Real, Just Unresolved

Major U.S. agencies—including the Pentagon, NASA, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, and even Canadian and European defense ministries—now publicly confirm that UAPs exist. While they have not officially concluded that these objects are extraterrestrial in origin, they have acknowledged them as unidentified, anomalous, and of unknown provenance.

“We are not dealing with weather balloons or conventional drones. These are objects with flight characteristics beyond our current understanding.”
Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, U.S. Senate Armed Services Committee

This is a seismic shift in public policy: where there was once secrecy and ridicule, there is now curiosity and disclosure.

Science Steps Up: NASA Leads the Call for Transparency

In a historic move, NASA joined the investigation in 2023, signaling that UAP research must no longer be the exclusive domain of military intelligence. Their goal is to turn the study of UAPs into mainstream science—driven by data, free from stigma, and accessible to the public.

  • NASA’s UAP Study Panel has called for:

    • More data from civilian pilots and commercial satellites

    • Artificial intelligence tools to analyze video and radar data

    • Public participation through open science and citizen reporting tools

“The stigma has prevented good science. We’re here to change that.”
Dr. David Spergel, Chair of NASA’s UAP Study

This marks the first time in history that a major space agency has publicly prioritized UAP research.

From Dismissive to Investigative: A Cultural Shift

Between 1947 and the early 2000s, public officials often brushed off UAP sightings with explanations like:

  • “Venus”

  • “Weather balloons”

  • “Swamp gas”

Now, trained military observers, astronauts, airline pilots, and radar operators are backed by their governments when reporting these anomalies.

Governments and scientists are saying: we believe you—and we need to investigate.

Why This Matters: A Wake-Up Call for Humanity

UAPs aren’t just visual oddities. They’ve been tracked:

  • Hovering near nuclear weapons sites

  • Darting around U.S. Navy carrier groups

  • Appearing over commercial airliners

  • Entering and exiting the ocean without a splash (transmedium behavior)

And they’ve done all this:

  • Without visible engines

  • Without sonic booms

  • Sometimes outmaneuvering fighter jets

These aren’t stories. These are military reports, radar logs, cockpit footage, and eyewitness accounts from career professionals.

Implications Go Far Beyond “Are They Aliens?”

Let’s set aside for a moment whether UAPs are of non-human origin. Even if they aren’t:

  • What if a foreign adversary has developed tech decades beyond us?

  • What if unknown atmospheric or physical phenomena are occurring regularly—and we’ve ignored them?

  • What if we’ve missed the chance to understand a new layer of physics because we didn’t want to look?

These questions are not abstract—they touch on:

  • National security

  • Air safety

  • Scientific discovery

  • Global cooperation

“The question isn’t do they exist anymore—it’s what are they?
Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick, Director of AARO

That shift—from denial to investigation—is arguably one of the most consequential changes in modern government transparency.

A Turning Point in History?

The UAP phenomenon, now taken seriously by national governments and world-class scientific agencies, may turn out to be:

  • The start of a technological awakening

  • The path to interstellar understanding

  • Or a wake-up call about gaps in our perception of reality

Whatever the answer, the door is now open, and we, as a society, are walking through it.

Canada’s Role in UAP Investigations & NORAD’s Growing Importance

Though often overshadowed by the U.S. in media coverage of UAP disclosures, Canada has quietly been stepping up its own investigation into unidentified aerial phenomena—particularly in coordination with NORAD (North American Aerospace Defense Command).

🔹 Canada’s Historical Involvement

Canada has had a long-standing awareness of UAPs, with government documents referencing UFO reports going back to the 1950s. Some highlights include:

  • Project Second Storey: A Cold War-era Royal Canadian Air Force project that tracked UFO sightings.

  • Transport Canada’s CADORS System: Still today, pilots report UAPs to the Civil Aviation Daily Occurrence Reporting System (CADORS), a publicly accessible aviation database.

🔗 CADORS Database

🔹 February 2024: Canada’s UAP Report & Research Proposal

In early 2024, CTV News broke the story that Canada’s top government scientist had formally recommended the creation of an official, federally backed UAP research initiative.

Key points from the leaked document:

  • Urged scientific collaboration with NORAD and NASA

  • Highlighted the growing number of UAP sightings over Canadian airspace and Arctic routes

  • Warned that foreign adversaries or unknown technologies could be operating undetected

🔗 CTV Coverage

🔹 NORAD’s Central Role in North American UAP Detection

NORAD, headquartered in Colorado Springs, is a binational U.S.-Canada command tasked with aerospace warning and control for North America.

In 2023–2025, NORAD has:

  • Confirmed UAP tracking events over Alaska, Yukon, and northern Quebec

  • Used F-22 Raptors and CF-18 Hornets to investigate unidentified high-altitude craft

  • Responded to a series of incidents involving unidentified balloons and transmedium objects

Following the infamous Chinese balloon shootdown in 2023, NORAD upgraded its surveillance posture, now including:

  • Arctic radar coverage

  • High-altitude balloon tracking

  • Integrated UAP detection systems tied to AARO

“Canada is no longer on the sidelines. We are part of the detection network and response architecture.”
General Wayne Eyre, Chief of the Defence Staff (Canada), 2024

What Comes Next for Canada?

  • Parliament has called for increased funding for civilian and military research into anomalous phenomena.

  • A push is underway to create a Canadian version of AARO to independently assess UAP events over national airspace.

  • Citizen science groups like Sky Canada Project have also begun organizing open-source skywatch data using high-resolution cameras, radar feeds, and AI filters.

Notable Revelations from the March 2024 Pentagon Report

Here’s a chronological summary of the major UAP-related events that have redefined the global discourse:

Year Event Description
2017 NYT exposes AATIP Secret Pentagon UFO program revealed; Luis Elizondo goes public
2019 Navy UAP videos confirmed Pentagon authenticates “GoFast,” “Gimbal,” and “FLIR1” videos
2020 U.S. establishes UAP Task Force Formalizes U.S. military efforts to track and assess UAPs
2021 First ODNI UAP Report 143 of 144 UAP cases remain unexplained; report goes public
2022 Congress mandates AARO Creation of the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office
2023 NASA begins UAP study Announces independent panel to investigate unexplained aerial events
2023 (July) Congressional hearings David Grusch testifies about “non-human biologics” and crash retrieval programs
2024 (March) AARO’s Historical Review Declares no verified alien craft found, but admits decades of anomalies
2024 (Feb) Canada’s UAP Report leaks Scientist calls for official Canadian UAP research initiative
2025 (Ongoing) Global coordination increases NATO, NORAD, and NASA collaborate on joint detection and response strategies

Notable Revelations from the March 2024 Pentagon Report

Report Finding Key Detail
Number of new UAP cases analyzed 366 (from military and intelligence sources)
Number of explained cases 163
Number of unexplained cases 203
Objects exhibiting transmedium travel 15+ (air-to-sea, sea-to-air)
Number of objects with no propulsion detected 37

Source: Pentagon UAP Report, March 2024

Read the full report summary here

Whistleblower Testimonies: Lifting the Veil on a Hidden Reality

While official reports and military videos have helped legitimize UAPs, it’s been the whistleblowers—insiders from the military, intelligence, and aerospace sectors—who’ve revealed some of the most jaw-dropping claims. These individuals allege that there are programs operating in secrecy far beyond public or congressional oversight, including efforts to recover, reverse-engineer, and conceal non-human technologies.

David Grusch: The Insider Who Shook the System

Who is he?

  • Former position: U.S. Air Force intelligence officer and member of the UAP Task Force

  • Security clearance: Held a Top Secret/SCI (Sensitive Compartmented Information) clearance

  • Public testimony: Gained national attention in 2023 after filing a whistleblower complaint with the U.S. Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG) under the Whistleblower Protection Act

“The U.S. has a multi-decade crash retrieval and reverse-engineering program for non-human craft. Non-human biologics have been recovered.”
David Grusch, testimony before U.S. Congress, July 2023

🔗 Read the full hearing transcript (NPR)

Key Claims by Grusch:

  • The U.S. government is in possession of intact and partially intact craft of non-human origin

  • These craft are being held by defense contractors (e.g., Lockheed Martin, Raytheon) in deeply compartmentalized, unacknowledged special access programs (USAPs)

  • He personally spoke with 40+ officials with direct knowledge of these programs

  • “Non-human biologics” were recovered alongside crash material

  • Congressional and Presidential oversight has been bypassed through legal and funding loopholes

“I was denied access to certain programs. I made complaints internally. I was threatened and retaliated against.”
Grusch, in multiple media interviews with NewsNation and The Debrief

Other Whistleblowers & Witnesses

Commander David Fravor (US Navy)

  • Pilot involved in the 2004 Tic Tac UAP encounter off the USS Nimitz

  • Describes an object that defied known physics—no wings, no exhaust, radar jamming ability

“It accelerated from a hover to out of radar range in under a second.”

Ryan Graves (US Navy)

  • Former Navy F/A-18 pilot who testified to “regular, near-daily UAP encounters” off the U.S. East Coast between 2014–2015

  • Claims objects would appear in restricted airspace, hover, and maneuver dangerously close to military aircraft

“These are not rare or isolated. They’re observed frequently.”

Legal Framework: Whistleblower Protection & Oversight

Thanks to increasing bipartisan support in Congress, whistleblowers now have expanded legal protections:

  • 2023 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) included provisions that:

    • Protect whistleblowers from retaliation

    • Mandate disclosure of non-earth origin material to Congress

    • Require the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) to investigate historical claims dating back to 1945

“It is now a felony to withhold UAP-related data from congressional inquiry.”
Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, 2024

Why Whistleblower Claims Matter

These individuals aren’t anonymous message board posters or backyard skywatchers. They are:

  • Highly credentialed intelligence and military officials

  • Operating under oath, legal protection, and oversight

  • Risking careers, reputations, and personal safety to expose hidden truths

Whether or not every detail is accurate, the volume and consistency of claims from credible sources make it increasingly difficult to dismiss the possibility that governments may know more than they’ve publicly admitted.

Summary Table: Key Whistleblower Testimonies

Name Background Key Claim Status
David Grusch USAF, UAP Task Force Crash retrievals, non-human biologics Testified under oath (2023)
Luis Elizondo Director, AATIP Pentagon obstruction, crash investigations Public advocate & author
Cmdr. David Fravor Navy pilot Tic Tac encounter defied physics Eyewitness, widely respected
Ryan Graves Navy pilot Near-daily UAPs in restricted airspace Testified before Congress

Media Disinformation and Historical Cover-Ups of UAPs

How governments and media shaped public perception—and suppressed the truth—for over 75 years

From Denial to Distraction: A Pattern of Suppression

For decades, reports of unidentified flying objects—now known as UAPs—were met with a uniform global response: ridicule, misdirection, and dismissal.

Governments and their aligned institutions worked not only to withhold information but to actively shape public perception, using mainstream media as a tool to discredit witnesses and maintain control over the narrative.

“The subject of UFOs is not taken seriously—not because the facts are unworthy of serious investigation, but because they have been actively marginalized.”
Leslie Kean, investigative journalist, author of “UFOs: Generals, Pilots and Government Officials Go on the Record”

Operation Mockingbird: The CIA’s Media Influence Machine

Declassified documents and Senate hearings in the 1970s revealed Operation Mockingbird, a covert CIA program that recruited journalists and editors to spread propaganda and control narratives during the Cold War.

  • While not explicitly created for UFO suppression, Mockingbird’s structure and methods were used to marginalize sensitive topics like UAPs, mind control, and covert technology development.

  • CIA documents from the late 1950s and 1960s explicitly discuss using the media to downplay UFO sightings.

“The Agency is to take every measure to debunk UFO reports, encouraging the media to ridicule witnesses.”
CIA memo from 1953 Robertson Panel

🔗 Declassified CIA UFO documents archive

The Robertson Panel (1953): Institutionalizing Disinformation

After a surge of credible UFO sightings in the late 1940s and early 1950s—including the famous 1947 Roswell incident and Washington D.C. radar blip encounters (1952)—the CIA convened the Robertson Panel.

Its conclusion?

  • UFOs were not necessarily a threat, but public interest in them was.

  • Recommended a “debunking campaign” using:

    • Television

    • Comic books

    • Mainstream newspapers

  • Advocated for ridiculing the topic to “reduce public interest.”

This is arguably where intentional UAP disinformation truly began.

Roswell (1947): The Birth of the Cover-Up Era

In July 1947, the U.S. Army issued a press release claiming it had recovered a “flying disc” near Roswell, New Mexico. Within 24 hours, the story changed: it was now just a “weather balloon.”

Decades later, documents and whistleblower accounts revealed:

  • Multiple witnesses saw non-human bodies

  • Debris was described as metallic, ultra-light, and unlike anything known

  • The military sealed the area, silenced witnesses, and flew debris to classified facilities

The case was reinvestigated in 1994 by the U.S. Air Force, which issued a report again blaming “Project Mogul,” a secret balloon program—yet failed to explain witness testimony or the immediate reversal of the original press release.

🔗 USAF Roswell Report – “Case Closed” (1994)

Pop Culture as Disinformation

Hollywood and television played a dual role—raising awareness while deflating seriousness.

  • Shows like The X-Files and Ancient Aliens built public curiosity.

  • But they also embedded UAPs in the realm of fantasy, making the topic easy to dismiss as science fiction.

Media gatekeeping further entrenched this. For decades:

  • Major outlets refused to cover UAPs seriously

  • Scientists and military pilots who reported sightings were mocked, ignored, or defunded

“The ridicule factor was engineered—it didn’t happen naturally.”
Dr. Jacques Vallée, astrophysicist and UAP researcher

Media "Debunkers": The Role of Skepticism for Hire

Several “experts” who appeared on TV and radio to debunk UFO claims were later revealed to have:

  • Intelligence backgrounds

  • Connections to defense contractors

  • CIA affiliations

Notable figures promoted standard explanations like:

  • Weather balloons

  • Flocks of birds

  • Atmospheric anomalies

Even mass sightings with radar confirmation were often dismissed on air without serious review.

Modern Examples of Media Suppression (2000s–2015)

  • Phoenix Lights (1997):
    Thousands saw massive silent craft over Arizona. Governor Fife Symington mocked it with a staged press conference—only to later admit he saw the craft too.

  • O’Hare UFO Sighting (2006):
    A UAP was seen hovering over Chicago’s O’Hare Airport by United Airlines employees. The FAA dismissed the event as a “weather anomaly,” and major networks failed to report it for weeks.

  • WikiLeaks & FOIA Disclosures:
    Documents released by WikiLeaks and FOIA requests showed that:

    • High-level U.S. diplomats were discussing UFOs behind closed doors

    • Canadian officials had ongoing discussions about NORAD’s UAP tracking

    • Yet few major outlets covered these documents in depth

The Turning Point: 2017–Present

After The New York Times broke the AATIP story in 2017, public and institutional attitudes began shifting:

Before 2017 After 2017
“UFO” = conspiracy “UAP” = acknowledged military concern
Whistleblowers silenced Whistleblowers protected by law
Media mockery Media legitimization (NYT, WaPo, Politico)
No official reports NASA & Pentagon-led studies

The Turning Point: 2017–Present

Understanding the history of suppression is crucial for moving forward:

  • Decades of ridicule harmed scientific inquiry and silenced credible witnesses.

  • Governments used perception management to control narratives and prevent public alarm.

  • Only now—through bipartisan congressional support, whistleblower protections, and public demand—is the wall of secrecy starting to crack.

“We cannot overstate how much truth was buried beneath decades of fear, stigma, and media control.”
Christopher Mellon, former Deputy Asst. Sec. of Defense for Intelligence

Concerns About Drones vs. Anomalous Technology

Why modern drone explanations fall short of explaining key UAP encounters

As reports of UAPs (Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena) have entered the mainstream, many skeptics and defense analysts have tried to attribute the sightings to drones—either domestic, foreign, or commercial.

While this may seem plausible in some cases, many well-documented UAP events, particularly those involving military sensor systems and trained observers, exhibit performance and characteristics that no known drone technology (as of 2025) can replicate.

What Makes a Drone a Plausible Explanation?

Drones—whether military or commercial—can certainly explain:

  • Hovering behavior

  • High-speed maneuvers within certain limits

  • Remote operation and stealth features

  • Misidentification in low-visibility conditions

And yes, in some cases, drones have been confirmed as the cause of initial UAP alerts—especially near restricted military airspace. A 2020 U.S. Navy report noted that several swarming incidents near warships were ultimately attributed to Chinese-made commercial drones used for surveillance.

🔗 Source: DefenseScoop – Drone Incursions and UAP Confusion

But Here’s Where Drone Explanations Fail

Many UAP cases—especially those recorded by military pilots and multiple sensor systems—show performance beyond any known drone capability, even by the most advanced state actors (like China, Russia, or the U.S.).

Key Anomalous Characteristics Not Explained by Drones:

Characteristic Known Drones UAPs
Instant acceleration (0 to Mach 1+ in <1 sec)
Right-angle turns at high speeds
Transmedium travel (air to water with no splash)
Hover without rotor downwash or heat signature
EM interference with radar and cockpit systems
Simultaneous multisensor detection (visual, radar, IR) ❌ (usually single-domain)

In the 2004 USS Nimitz “Tic Tac” encounter, pilot Cmdr. David Fravor witnessed an object:

  • Hovering motionless with no visible means of propulsion

  • Accelerating to disappear in less than a second

  • Interacting with radar and jamming targeting systems

“This is not like anything we’ve ever seen. It had no wings, no rotors, no exhaust.”
Cmdr. Fravor, testimony before U.S. Congress

Drone or Something Else? The Problem of Misattribution

The rush to explain away UAPs as drones creates a scientific blind spot. While drone misidentification does account for some sightings, using this explanation as a default risks:

  • Ignoring high-fidelity, corroborated incidents that remain unexplained

  • Downplaying national security risks if these are truly advanced foreign craft

  • Delaying deeper inquiry into physics, aerospace engineering, and non-human possibilities

“If everything is a drone, then nothing gets investigated. That’s intellectually dishonest and scientifically reckless.”
Dr. Garry Nolan, Stanford University immunologist and UAP analyst

Unknowns vs. Known-Unknowns

To borrow a phrase from former U.S. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld:

  • Known-knowns: Chinese or Russian drones, balloons, commercial UAVs

  • Known-unknowns: Sensor errors, weather events

  • Unknown-unknowns (UAPs): Objects that behave in ways beyond current aerospace models

It’s the last category that national defense and intelligence officials find most concerning.

Security Risk: Drone ≠ Safe

Even if some UAPs are drones, the implication is still serious. If foreign adversaries can fly unmarked, undetected craft over U.S. and Canadian military zones, it signals a major vulnerability in radar and airspace security.

In 2021, the U.S. Navy tracked up to 100 objects near sensitive warships over a two-week period. While some were later suspected to be drones, many were not conclusively identified.

“If we don’t know who’s flying what over our ships and silos, that’s a national security failure—regardless of origin.”
Sen. Marco Rubio, Vice Chair of Senate Intelligence Committee

Summary: Drones Explain Some—Not All

Category May Be Explained by Drones?
Nighttime visual-only sightings ✅ Likely
Transmedium objects tracked by radar ❌ No
Tic Tac/Nimitz and FLIR videos ❌ No
Swarm behaviors near military zones ✅ In some cases
Objects interfering with radar systems ❌ Rare, unexplained
Hypersonic maneuvers with no sonic boom ❌ No known drone can do this

While drones will undoubtedly account for some UAP reports, the data—especially when corroborated across multiple sensors—suggests something far more advanced in many cases.

To say “it’s probably a drone” is no longer sufficient. The real question is:

What kind of drone can outmaneuver an F/A-18, avoid radar lock, and enter the ocean without a splash—
and why don’t we know who controls it?

Why the Soft Disclosure Strategy?

Governments may be engaging in a gradual, soft disclosure strategy—a drip-feed of data that:

  • Normalizes the concept of UAPs

  • Prepares the public psychologically for deeper revelations

  • Avoids panic and disruption to existing systems of belief, governance, and security

This strategy might explain why:

  • Disclosures are often buried in technical reports or quietly released on Fridays

  • Testimonies are conducted in closed-door briefings before going public

  • Language remains intentionally vague (e.g., “non-human origin,” “anomalous craft,” “biologics”)

“The goal is to validate the phenomenon, not necessarily to explain it—yet.”
Christopher Mellon, former Deputy Asst. Secretary of Defense for Intelligence

From "Are We Alone?" to "We May Not Be"

The question is no longer whether UAPs are real—they are.

The question is no longer whether governments are hiding something—they have.

Now, the question that once lived in science fiction is being grappled with in congressional hearings, scientific reports, and policy frameworks:

❓ What is the origin of these craft?
❓ Are we interacting with non-human intelligence?
❓ How long have we known—and who knew?

The Implications of "We Are Not Alone"

If contact or visitation has occurred—even in limited form—the implications are staggering:

Domain Implication
Science Rewrite of physics, biology, and cosmology
Religion Reinterpretation of doctrine and human purpose
Security Assessment of technological disparity and intent
Society Psychological shock, paradigm shift
Economy Disruption to aerospace, defense, energy, and data sectors

Even the suggestion that we’re not alone forces us to rethink our place in the universe, our history, and the very definition of what it means to be “human.”

Disclosure Is Not a Conspiracy Anymore—It’s a Process in Motion

In 2025, we are witnessing the most credible, coordinated global effort in history to address the UAP phenomenon with transparency, science, and courage.

We may not yet have a presidential podium reveal or an “Independence Day” style arrival—but we are edging closer to an answer that may redefine human civilization.

“Disclosure is not an event. It is a process.”
Luis Elizondo

Shifting Tone: What Officials Are Actually Saying

While no world government has formally declared contact with non-human intelligence, a steady drumbeat of subtle acknowledgments suggests that we are being prepared—or at least positioned—for a broader revelation.

🇺🇸 U.S. Intelligence and Defense Officials

  • David Grusch (Whistleblower, 2023):
    Testified under oath that the U.S. government is in possession of craft of “non-human origin” and has retrieved non-human biologics.
    🧾 Filed a legal whistleblower complaint under the Intelligence Community Whistleblower Protection Act.

  • Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL):

    “There are people with very high clearances and long-standing records of service who have come forward with credible information. If it’s not true, then someone’s doing an elaborate job of lying to Congress under penalty of perjury.”

  • AARO (All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office) – March 2024 Report:
    While concluding that no “direct evidence” of extraterrestrial craft was found, the report emphasized that multiple UAP incidents remain unresolved, and that their flight characteristics defy known technology.

🛰️ NASA

  • In its 2023 UAP Report, NASA stated:

    “We cannot rule out non-terrestrial origins because the data is not sufficient to confirm or deny.”

  • NASA appointed its first Director of UAP Research, though the identity remains classified “for security reasons.”

🇨🇦 Canada

  • In 2024, Canada’s top government scientist proposed an official UAP research initiative, highlighting the need for cross-agency collaboration with NORAD and NASA.

  • Canadian pilots and NORAD operators have reported UAP incursions over Arctic airspace, prompting renewed calls for public transparency.

🌍 Other Countries

  • France’s CNES and its GEIPAN branch have openly investigated UAPs since the 1970s.

  • Brazil, Chile, and Argentina all have government-backed UAP research divisions.

  • In 2021, Japan’s Defense Ministry confirmed a policy to record and respond to UAP incursions.

The Stigma is Gone. Now What?

For over half a century, the question “Are we alone in the universe?” has lived at the crossroads of philosophy, science fiction, and private belief. But now, governments, intelligence agencies, and respected scientists are publicly entertaining that we might not be alone—and we may have known for a long time.

The era of eye-rolls and mockery is over. With governments now publicly admitting that UAPs exist and might be of non-human origin, the question isn’t whether UFOs are real—it’s why they’re here and what comes next.

Public pressure for further transparency, scientific investigation, and global cooperation is growing. The door is now wide open. The only question that remains is:

Are we ready to step through it?

UFO UAP Disclosure

Source Material